When it comes to sharing Axure prototypes, you have two main options: publishing to Axure Cloud or exporting locally as HTML files. Each method has its own advantages and use cases. This comprehensive guide will help you make the right choice for your team.
Understanding the Two Methods
Axure Cloud Publishing
Axure Cloud is Axure's official hosting service that allows you to publish prototypes directly from Axure RP to the cloud. Your prototypes are hosted on Axure's servers and can be accessed through a unique URL.
Local HTML Export
Local export generates HTML files that you can host anywhere - on your own servers, third-party hosting services like Axure Viewer, or share as downloadable files.
Axure Cloud: Pros and Cons
Advantages of Axure Cloud
- Quick Publishing: One-click publishing directly from Axure RP
- Version Control: Automatic versioning with ability to restore previous versions
- Team Collaboration: Built-in commenting and feedback system
- Access Control: Set passwords and permissions for viewers
- Updates: Easy to update - just republish from Axure RP
- Mobile App: Official Axure mobile app for viewing prototypes
- Analytics: Basic viewing analytics included
Disadvantages of Axure Cloud
- Cost: Requires paid subscription (starts at $25/month for individuals)
- Storage Limits: Limited storage based on plan
- Internet Required: Must have internet to publish and view
- Vendor Lock-in: Dependent on Axure's service availability
- Performance: Loading speed depends on Axure's servers
- Customization: Limited control over hosting environment
- Privacy Concerns: Sensitive data stored on third-party servers
Local HTML Export: Pros and Cons
Advantages of Local Export
- Free: No recurring subscription costs
- Flexibility: Host anywhere - your servers, cloud storage, or services like Axure Viewer
- Offline Access: Can be viewed without internet connection
- Complete Control: Full control over files and hosting
- No Limits: No storage or bandwidth restrictions (depends on your hosting)
- Privacy: Keep sensitive prototypes on your own infrastructure
- Customization: Can modify exported files if needed
- Portability: Easy to archive and transfer
Disadvantages of Local Export
- Manual Process: Requires exporting and uploading separately
- No Built-in Versioning: Must manage versions manually
- Limited Collaboration: No integrated commenting system
- Update Process: Need to re-export and re-upload for changes
- Hosting Required: Must arrange your own hosting solution
- Technical Skills: May require basic web hosting knowledge
Feature Comparison Table
Here's a side-by-side comparison to help you decide:
| Feature | Axure Cloud | Local Export |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | $25-99/month | Free |
| Publishing Speed | Very Fast | Moderate |
| Version Control | Built-in | Manual |
| Collaboration | Excellent | Limited |
| Offline Access | No | Yes |
| Privacy Control | Limited | Full Control |
| Storage Limits | Yes | No |
| Customization | Limited | Full |
When to Choose Axure Cloud
Axure Cloud is ideal when:
- You need frequent collaboration and feedback from team members
- Version control is critical for your workflow
- You want the simplest publishing process possible
- Budget allows for subscription costs
- You're working with distributed teams across locations
- You need built-in access control and permissions
- Your organization uses Axure RP across multiple projects
When to Choose Local Export
Local HTML export is better when:
- Budget is a constraint or you need a free solution
- You work with sensitive or confidential information
- You need offline access to prototypes
- You want full control over hosting and files
- You already have hosting infrastructure
- You're working on client projects requiring deliverable files
- Storage and bandwidth are unlimited on your hosting
Hybrid Approach: Best of Both Worlds
Many teams use a combination of both methods:
- Internal Collaboration: Use Axure Cloud for active projects requiring team feedback
- Client Delivery: Export locally for final client presentations and archiving
- Public Demos: Use free services like Axure Viewer for public showcase
- Sensitive Projects: Export locally for confidential work
Alternative: Third-Party Hosting Services
Services like Axure Viewer offer a middle ground:
- Free hosting with no subscription
- Quick upload process (though not as fast as Axure Cloud)
- No storage limits
- Instant shareable links
- No vendor lock-in - you keep the HTML files
Making the Decision
Consider these questions when choosing:
For Small Teams or Freelancers
If you're a freelancer or small team, local export with services like Axure Viewer often makes more sense economically while still providing easy sharing capabilities.
For Large Organizations
Larger organizations with multiple concurrent projects and distributed teams typically benefit from Axure Cloud's collaboration features despite the higher cost.
For Agencies
Agencies often prefer local export to maintain control over client deliverables and avoid ongoing costs that affect project margins.
Migration Between Methods
The good news is you're not locked into one method. You can easily switch between Axure Cloud and local export as your needs change. All you need is your original .rp file.
Conclusion
Both Axure Cloud and local HTML export are valid options, each with distinct advantages. Your choice should depend on your specific needs:
- Choose Axure Cloud if collaboration, version control, and convenience are priorities and budget allows
- Choose Local Export if cost, privacy, flexibility, or offline access are more important
- Consider a hybrid approach to get the best of both methods
Remember, the best solution is the one that fits your team's workflow and requirements. Don't be afraid to experiment with both methods to find what works best for you.
Try Free Prototype Hosting
Want the flexibility of local export with easy online sharing? Try Axure Viewer - no registration required, no limits.
Upload Your Prototype